Difference between revisions of "Meta"

From BITPlan Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
[[File:Auriga_Leader.jpg|400px|link=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auriga_Leader]]
 
[[File:Auriga_Leader.jpg|400px|link=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auriga_Leader]]
 
=== What is it it? ===
 
=== What is it it? ===
 +
The picture shows the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auriga_Leader Auriga Leader].
 +
The wikipedia article has some statements about this thing.
 +
[https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2871898 Auriga Leader WikiData Item Q2871898] makes some of the statements
 +
available in computer readable form.
  
 
=== [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whatchamacallit Whatchamacallit?] ===  
 
=== [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whatchamacallit Whatchamacallit?] ===  

Revision as of 18:39, 7 January 2018

No fear of Meta

When you start talking "Meta" you might end up very lonely. Meta denotes an abstraction level that seems to be so far away from reality that quite a few people simply do not bother. Basically there are three abstraction level on which you can deal with things:

  1. The thing level
  2. The concept level
  3. The meta level

The thing level

A thing (also called object, entity, instance, item, element) is something, anything. If you can point at it or talk about it or call it "it" then it is probably a thing.

There is a thing called "concept" and that makes Meta interesting. Talking about a thing needs to clarify Whatchamacallit?

Example for a thing

Auriga Leader.jpg

What is it it?

The picture shows the Auriga Leader. The wikipedia article has some statements about this thing. Auriga Leader WikiData Item Q2871898 makes some of the statements available in computer readable form.

Whatchamacallit?

  • I call it a ship.
  • I also call it a roro-ship.
  • I also call it a Vehicle carrier
  • I also call it a thing.
  • I also call it a vessel.

The concept level

The meta level

Why you should not fear the Meta level

References